An application (including all the particulars and the statement of the particulars) in the format of FORM IV has to have to be sent to the registrar along with the requisite fees. A separate application has to be made for separate works along with the power of attorney.The applications should be signed by the applicant or the advocate in whose favourthe Power of Attorney has been executed. The Power of Attorney signed by the party and accepted by the advocate should also be enclosed.

After you file your application and receive diary number you have to wait for a mandatory period of 30 days so that no objection is filed in the Copyright office against your claim that particular work is created by you.If there are no objections received within 30 days, the scrutinizer will check the application for any discrepancy and if no discrepancy is there, the registration will be done and an extract will be sent to the registrar for the entry in the Register of Copyright.

If any objection is received, the examiner will send a letter to both the parties about the objections and will give them both a hearing.After the hearing, if the objections are resolved the scrutinizer will scrutinize the application and approve or reject the application as the case may be


Our and providing a leading platform from which to service the built environment and in particular, our valued Clients. We provide a variety of specialist searches to in-house and private practice patent attorneys, universities and technology companies. Mission is to offer excellent IP service in each of our professional disciplines, in accordance with statutory practices, codes of conduct and integrity, thereby developing our team.

Our Projects

+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0

A company ABC wanted to invest in R&D projects and has 10
proposed marketable inventions from the scientists. We firstly conducted state of the art
search for checking the feasibility of the technology along with the trends of the same and
secondly, we conducted a patentability search for all the 10 projects to identify their
chances of getting a patent. Six inventions were found to be known entirely through the
study, four invention were new and inventive. ABC company filed all 4 applications and all
of them are under process right now.


A company XYZ wanted to file several trademarks for their cosmetic
range. We have conducted trademark searches in the relevant classes so that the chances
of objection can be minimized. After conducting the search of 58 trademarks, we found
that 15 of the words suggested were already registered by others. 5 of the marks were
similar to the results found. We initiated the filing of 43 trademarks for XYZ company and
21 of them got registered within 6 months of the filing and rest of them are under the


A company ABC has given us to conduct a patentability search on an
innovation they are developing to help the patients and delivering all kind of hospitality
services to the patient at their home only. After conducting a relevant research, the team
has drafted the patent in India and has also filed a PCT national phase application.


A company VTS wanted to launch a drug in the market with an
increased efficacy, for which they have filed several patents after a patentability search.
We conducted Landscape searches for VTS to understand the market trends and the
potential companies for their merger and accusation.


A company EFG asked us to do a state-of-the-art search & landscape
search on a medicine having an injectable form of a natural bio resource that is increasing
the bioavailability of the medicine.


A company ERD wanted to file a trademark for their firm to increase
their retailing / business services. Their trademark undergone a third-party opposition and
after filing a reply to the opposition, the trademark got registered.


A company GHQ wanted to conduct several FTO searches for their
different drug delivery Instruments. Target jurisdictions of the projects were India & south
Africa. After conducting the FTO search we found that all the relevant patents were
expired and the company GHQ is free to launch their products.


A Company PQR wanted to conduct Infringement searches to
identify the potential infringers. After competition of the of the Infringement searches,
they found 8 companies who were using the same technologies and two of them were
selling with the similar brands also. The company PQR decided to file patent infringement
as well as trademark Infringement case against all of them.


A trainer wanted to protect his content from copying from the
competitors and we advised him to file for a copyright application under the literary
content. He received his copyright certificate within 8 months.


A company UVW wanted to file a patent application for an
automobile innovation. We not only advised them to file for a patent application for the
technology but also to proceed with the design application for the aesthetic appeal of the
product as well as the trademark application for the product name and logo. That helped
the client to go under broader protection of the same innovation under different IP heads.


A company DEF approached us on the last day of PCT national phase
filing in India. They approached us at the very last moments but we filed the PCT national
phase and they were happy with the quick response time and delivery.

previous arrow
next arrow



" Innovation to implementation "

Address :

  • Mumbai Office: 107, Pranav commercial plaza, MG road, mulund west, mumbai 400080
  • +(91) 7827069972 , +(91) 9582199496
  • Trayambak, B-43, Sector 2, Noida, UP-201301
  • skype ID ishi3103

                      Copyright © Trayambak